Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Scans see 'gay brain differences'

The study suggests sexual preference is set in the womb
The brains of gay men and women look like those found in straight people of the opposite sex, research suggests.

The Swedish study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences journal, compared the size of the brain's halves in 90 adults.

Gay men and straight women had halves of a similar size, while the right side was bigger in lesbian women and straight men.

A UK scientist said this was evidence sexual preference was set in the womb.

As far as I'm concerned there is no argument any more - if you are gay, you are born gay

Dr Qazi Rahman
Queen Mary, University of London

Scientists have noticed for some time that homosexual people of both sexes have differences in certain cognitive abilities, suggesting there may be subtle differences in their brain structure.

This is the first time, however, that scientists have used brain scanners to try to look for the source of those differences.

A group of 90 healthy gay and straight adults, men and women, were scanned by the Karolinska Institute scientists to measure the volume of both sides, or hemispheres, of their brain.

When these results were collected, it was found that lesbian women and straight men shared a particular "asymmetry" in their hemisphere size, while straight women and gay men had no difference between the size of the different halves of their brain.

In other words, structurally, at least, gay men were more like straight women, and gay women more like straight men.

A further experiment found that in one particular area of the brain, the amygdala, there were other significant differences.

In heterosexual men and lesbian women, there were more nerve "connections" in the right side of the amygdala, compared with the left.

The reverse, with more neural connections in the left amygdala, was the case in homosexual men and straight women.

The Karolinska team said that these differences could not be mainly explained by "learned" effects, but needed another mechanism to set them, either before or after birth.

'Fight, flight or mate'

Dr Qazi Rahman, a lecturer in cognitive biology at Queen Mary, University of London, said that he believed that these brain differences were laid down early in foetal development.

"As far as I'm concerned there is no argument any more - if you are gay, you are born gay," he said.

The amygdala, he said, was important because of its role in "orientating", or directing, the rest of the brain in response to an emotional stimulus - be it during the "fight or flight" response, or the presence of a potential mate.

"In other words, the brain network which determines what sexual orientation actually 'orients' towards is similar between gay men and straight women, and between lesbian women and straight men.

"This makes sense given that gay men have a sexual preference which is like that of women in general, that is, preferring men, and vice versa for lesbian women."

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

Saturday, June 7, 2008

MEPs' stand on discrimination by Albert Gauci Cunningham (Times of Malta, Saturday 7th June 2008)

That the two PN MEPs are against or do not endorse gay partnerships or marriages or whatever anyone would like to call them is by now clear but that these two abstain on a motion whose aim was to combat discrimination against various issues (homosexuality included) is very unfair and verges on total hypocrisy. Had homosexuality not been included in the "list" I bet my last penny in my pocket that the two MEPs would have come to Malta trumpeting their heroic act of kindness towards a more "inclusive" society.

Which begs the question: Why? Why does the party we have put our belief in time and again persist in insulting our intelligence and work against our close interests? Why is it not even capable of agreeing with things that in a "Christian society" are deemed fair: inclusivity, love, equality and condemnation of barefaced discrimination? Why do some politicians persist in giving the impression that Malta is holier than the Vatican? What is David Casa going to tell the many gay people (and there are many believe me!) who support the PN or who even work within the PN? Is he going to tell them that he loves them and respects them but is too afraid of rocking the ultra-conservative boat?

This is exactly what makes me fume about the PN and this might very well be the main reason why many people like me are leaving the party in droves. Before anyone gives me the usual reaction of "keeping the party's values" intact, may I remind all and sundry that in no political document, in no electoral programme and in no written record is there any "value" of not having a position on discrimination.

Playing Humpty Dumpty does not work; it didn't work with the MLP and they hit rock bottom and it will not work with the PN either. Just as many PN gurus used to pontificate about how a no vote is a vote for the MLP, an abstention, in this case, is nothing less than a vote against Europe's drive to fight any discrimination on the basis of sexuality among others.

Others might be petrified to challenge the status quo but I am not. I believed in the PN and gave the little I could to see it in power as it was the better choice but I did not give a carte blanche to anyone to trample on my rights under the guise of "values" and "tradition". When PN politicians cross the line of decency, they will be no less deserving of criticism from those who support it.

Always you


Before I dream may I hope for you.

Before I long may I reach for you.

Before I judge, may I listen to you.

Before I rush, may I rest with you.

Before I shout, may I call on you.

Before I doubt, may I hear from you.

Before I brag, may I point to you.

Before I fear, may I trust in you.

Before I act, may I remember you.

So that in these things, in all I do

It is not I that am first, but always you.

Books by James Alison

Books by Henri J.M Nouwen

What's morally wrong with homosexuality?